Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:02
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Can BRICS defeat the US economically?
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
'Mission: Impossible 8': Inside How They Shot Underwater Submarine - IndieWire
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Galerie David Guiraud : Deep Space & Celestial Objects - The Eye of Photography
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
GM has another affordable EV in the works and it’s not the next-gen Chevy Bolt - Electrek
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How can we get rid of viral fever naturaly?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.